Counter-Terrorism: International Law and Practice by Ana Maria Salinas De Frias, Katja Samuel, Nigel White

By Ana Maria Salinas De Frias, Katja Samuel, Nigel White

The reaction of governments to terrorism is among the such a lot debatable problems with the twenty-first century. Balancing the need to accomplish safeguard with the safeguarding of human rights has proved to be hugely contentious.

This e-book analyzes the foreign rule of legislations framework within which counter-terrorism responses happen, specifically these of foreign human rights, humanitarian, legal, and refugee legislations. It makes a speciality of the most urgent, rising and/or under-researched matters and tensions, together with: the coverage offerings linked to assembly defense imperatives; the tensions among the felony justice method of counter-terrorism and the army strategy; the id of lacunae inside of present criminal frameworks; and tensions among government, judicial, and legislative responses.

It addresses a variety of concerns, resembling: an research of key felony ideas; emergency and government measures; radicalization; governmental impunity; category, management and remedy of battlefield detainees; extrajudicial and precise killings; kinds of, and remedy in, detention; non-refoulement; diplomatic assurances; interrogation as opposed to torture; impressive rendition; discrimination; reparations for sufferers of terrorist assaults and defense responses; (mis)use of army and immigration tribunals; judicial and institutional built and rising rule of legislations norms on terrorism; non-judicial oversight by way of democratic responsibility; importance of rule of legislations rules to non-legal counter-terrorist coverage; and the id and research of most sensible practices.

Drawing jointly a magnificent spectrum of felony and non-legal, nationwide and institutional, practitioner, coverage and educational services, this e-book is an unmissable reference paintings on all points of counter-terrorism coverage.

Show description

Read or Download Counter-Terrorism: International Law and Practice PDF

Similar terrorism books

The Routledge Handbook of Terrorism Research (Routledge Handbooks)

This significant new guide synthesises greater than 20 years of scholarly examine, and gives a entire review of the sector of terrorism studies.

The content material of the guide relies at the responses to a questionnaire via approximately a hundred specialists from greater than 20 nations in addition to the explicit services and adventure of the amount editor and a few of the participants. jointly, they advisor the reader throughout the voluminous literature on terrorism, and suggest a brand new consensus definition of terrorism, according to an in depth evaluation of current conceptualisations. The paintings additionally encompasses a huge selection of typologies and surveys a variety of theories of terrorism. extra chapters survey terrorist databases and supply a advisor to to be had assets on terrorism in libraries and on the net. it's also the main entire global listing of Extremist, Terrorist and different agencies linked to Guerrilla conflict, Political Violence, Protest and arranged- and Cyber-Crime.

The Routledge instruction manual of Terrorism study might be an important paintings of reference for college kids and researchers of terrorism and political violence, safeguard reviews, criminology, political technology and diplomacy, and of serious curiosity to policymakers and execs within the box of counter-terrorism.

From the Terrorists' Point of View: What They Experience and Why They Come to Destroy

Featuring an image of the realm giving upward thrust to Islamic terrorism, From the Terrorists' viewpoint argues that terrorism arises from a deep and pervasive identification situation in Islamic societies. The account awarded in those 10 chapters is formed by means of the author's first-hand reports of existence within the Islamic global, in addition to his greater than quarter-century of study at the psychology of clash and radicalism.

Phases of Terrorism in the Age of Globalization: From Christopher Columbus to Osama bin Laden

Levels of Terrorism within the Age of Globalization considers terrorism as a facet of the capitalist global method for nearly 5 centuries. Jalata's study unearths that terrorism can emerge from above as kingdom terrorism and lower than as subversive agencies or teams.

Extra info for Counter-Terrorism: International Law and Practice

Example text

468 (14 March 2008) (829 fn 66) Ms X and Ms Y (Argentina), IACHR Report No. h. of the American Convention of Human Rights (Advisory Opinion OC-12/91) IACtHR Series A No 12 (6 December 1991) (791 fn 17) Case of the Constitutional Court v Peru (Merits, reparations, and costs) IACtHR Series C No 71 (31 January 2001) (827 fn 61) Case of Godínez Cruz v Honduras (Judgment on the merits) IACtHR Series C No 5 (20 January 1989) (789 fn 10, 796 fn 43) Case of de la Cruz Flores v Peru (Merits, reparations, and costs) IACtHR Series C No 115 (18 November 2004) (221 fn 67, 792, 792 fn 22, fn 23, 793 fn 24, 795 fn 40, 806 fn 99, 809 fn 123, 834 fn 92, 835 fn 93, fn 94) Case of Durand and Ugarte v Peru (Judgment on the merits) IACtHR Series C No 68 (16 August 2000) (209 fn 9, 380 fn 138, 719 fn 203, 805 fn 98, 806 fn 99, 807, 807 fn 106, 808 fn 115, fn 116) li Table of Cases Case of Enforceability of the Right to Reply or Correction (arts 14(1), 1(1) and 2, American Convention on Human Rights) (Advisory Opinion OC-7/86) IACtHR Series A No 7 (29 August 1986) (791 fn 17) Case of Escher v Brazil (Preliminary objections, merits, reparations, and costs) IACtHR Series C No 200 (6 July 2009) (832 fn 78, fn 80, 833 fn 86, 834 fn 87, fn 88) Case of Ticona Estrada and others v Bolivia (Judgment on the merits, reparation, and costs) IACtHR Series C No 191 (7 November 2008) (806 fn 99) Case of “Five Pensioners” v Peru (Merits, reparations, and costs) IACtHR Series C No 98 (28 February 2003) (815 fn 15) Case of Fairén Garbi and Solís Corrales v Honduras (Judgment on the merits) IACtHR Series C No 6 (15 March 1989) (796 fn 43) Case of Baldeón García v Peru (Merits, reparations, and costs) IACtHR Series C No 147 (6 April 2006) (221 fn 57, 793 fn 28, 795 fn 38, fn 40, 796 fn 41, fn 42) Case of Servellón García and others v Honduras (Judgment on reparations and costs) IACtHR Series C No 152 (21 September 2006) (804 fn 90) Case of González and others (‘Cotton Field’) v Mexico (Judgment on preliminary exception, merits, reparations, and costs) IACtHR Series C No 205 (16 November 2009) (808 fn 116, 821 fn 38) Case of Habeas corpus in Emergency Situations (Arts.

H. of the American Convention of Human Rights (Advisory Opinion OC-12/91) IACtHR Series A No 12 (6 December 1991) (791 fn 17) Case of the Constitutional Court v Peru (Merits, reparations, and costs) IACtHR Series C No 71 (31 January 2001) (827 fn 61) Case of Godínez Cruz v Honduras (Judgment on the merits) IACtHR Series C No 5 (20 January 1989) (789 fn 10, 796 fn 43) Case of de la Cruz Flores v Peru (Merits, reparations, and costs) IACtHR Series C No 115 (18 November 2004) (221 fn 67, 792, 792 fn 22, fn 23, 793 fn 24, 795 fn 40, 806 fn 99, 809 fn 123, 834 fn 92, 835 fn 93, fn 94) Case of Durand and Ugarte v Peru (Judgment on the merits) IACtHR Series C No 68 (16 August 2000) (209 fn 9, 380 fn 138, 719 fn 203, 805 fn 98, 806 fn 99, 807, 807 fn 106, 808 fn 115, fn 116) li Table of Cases Case of Enforceability of the Right to Reply or Correction (arts 14(1), 1(1) and 2, American Convention on Human Rights) (Advisory Opinion OC-7/86) IACtHR Series A No 7 (29 August 1986) (791 fn 17) Case of Escher v Brazil (Preliminary objections, merits, reparations, and costs) IACtHR Series C No 200 (6 July 2009) (832 fn 78, fn 80, 833 fn 86, 834 fn 87, fn 88) Case of Ticona Estrada and others v Bolivia (Judgment on the merits, reparation, and costs) IACtHR Series C No 191 (7 November 2008) (806 fn 99) Case of “Five Pensioners” v Peru (Merits, reparations, and costs) IACtHR Series C No 98 (28 February 2003) (815 fn 15) Case of Fairén Garbi and Solís Corrales v Honduras (Judgment on the merits) IACtHR Series C No 6 (15 March 1989) (796 fn 43) Case of Baldeón García v Peru (Merits, reparations, and costs) IACtHR Series C No 147 (6 April 2006) (221 fn 57, 793 fn 28, 795 fn 38, fn 40, 796 fn 41, fn 42) Case of Servellón García and others v Honduras (Judgment on reparations and costs) IACtHR Series C No 152 (21 September 2006) (804 fn 90) Case of González and others (‘Cotton Field’) v Mexico (Judgment on preliminary exception, merits, reparations, and costs) IACtHR Series C No 205 (16 November 2009) (808 fn 116, 821 fn 38) Case of Habeas corpus in Emergency Situations (Arts.

H. of the American Convention of Human Rights (Advisory Opinion OC-12/91) IACtHR Series A No 12 (6 December 1991) (791 fn 17) Case of the Constitutional Court v Peru (Merits, reparations, and costs) IACtHR Series C No 71 (31 January 2001) (827 fn 61) Case of Godínez Cruz v Honduras (Judgment on the merits) IACtHR Series C No 5 (20 January 1989) (789 fn 10, 796 fn 43) Case of de la Cruz Flores v Peru (Merits, reparations, and costs) IACtHR Series C No 115 (18 November 2004) (221 fn 67, 792, 792 fn 22, fn 23, 793 fn 24, 795 fn 40, 806 fn 99, 809 fn 123, 834 fn 92, 835 fn 93, fn 94) Case of Durand and Ugarte v Peru (Judgment on the merits) IACtHR Series C No 68 (16 August 2000) (209 fn 9, 380 fn 138, 719 fn 203, 805 fn 98, 806 fn 99, 807, 807 fn 106, 808 fn 115, fn 116) li Table of Cases Case of Enforceability of the Right to Reply or Correction (arts 14(1), 1(1) and 2, American Convention on Human Rights) (Advisory Opinion OC-7/86) IACtHR Series A No 7 (29 August 1986) (791 fn 17) Case of Escher v Brazil (Preliminary objections, merits, reparations, and costs) IACtHR Series C No 200 (6 July 2009) (832 fn 78, fn 80, 833 fn 86, 834 fn 87, fn 88) Case of Ticona Estrada and others v Bolivia (Judgment on the merits, reparation, and costs) IACtHR Series C No 191 (7 November 2008) (806 fn 99) Case of “Five Pensioners” v Peru (Merits, reparations, and costs) IACtHR Series C No 98 (28 February 2003) (815 fn 15) Case of Fairén Garbi and Solís Corrales v Honduras (Judgment on the merits) IACtHR Series C No 6 (15 March 1989) (796 fn 43) Case of Baldeón García v Peru (Merits, reparations, and costs) IACtHR Series C No 147 (6 April 2006) (221 fn 57, 793 fn 28, 795 fn 38, fn 40, 796 fn 41, fn 42) Case of Servellón García and others v Honduras (Judgment on reparations and costs) IACtHR Series C No 152 (21 September 2006) (804 fn 90) Case of González and others (‘Cotton Field’) v Mexico (Judgment on preliminary exception, merits, reparations, and costs) IACtHR Series C No 205 (16 November 2009) (808 fn 116, 821 fn 38) Case of Habeas corpus in Emergency Situations (Arts.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.10 of 5 – based on 15 votes