By Ronald J. Fisher (auth.)
Read or Download The Social Psychology of Intergroup and International Conflict Resolution PDF
Best war & peace books
Why was once there a planned plan to struggle the battle in Iraq yet none to win the peace? this question, which has triggered such confusion and consternation one of the American public and been the topic of a lot political wrangling during the last years, is the focal point of Lt. Col. Isaiah Wilson's research.
Confirm your scholars have entry to the authoritative, in-depth and obtainable content material of this sequence for the IB historical past degree. This sequence for the IB background degree has taken the readability, accessibility, reliability and in-depth research of our best-selling entry to heritage sequence and tailored it to higher healthy the IB learner's wishes.
Comprising essays by means of Michael W. Doyle, Liberal Peace examines the specified value of liberalism for diplomacy. the quantity starts via outlining the 2 legacies of liberalism in diplomacy - how and why liberal states have maintained peace between themselves whereas while being vulnerable to making warfare opposed to non-liberal states.
This ebook is set the convergence of 2 difficulties: the continued realities of clash and compelled migration in Africa’s nice Lakes quarter, and the trouble of citizenship and belonging. through bringing them jointly, the goal is to determine how, mixed, they could aid element the way in which in the direction of attainable ideas.
- Arab Revolutions and Beyond: The Middle East and Reverberations in the Americas
- Corruption, Global Security, and World Order
- Great Power Peace and American Primacy: The Origins and Future of a New International Order
- Shadows of War: Violence, Power, and International Profiteering in the Twenty-First Century (California Series in Public Anthropology)
Additional info for The Social Psychology of Intergroup and International Conflict Resolution
Another reason is that people seem to prefer information that confirms that they are similar to other members of their own group and different from members of an outgroup resulting in selective attention to within-group similarities and betweengroup differences (Wilder & Allen, 1978). One issue that is still a source of some controversy is whether the out-group is perceived to be more homogeneous than the in-group. Intuitively, one would suppose that greater familiarity and knowledge of the in-group would make this hypothesis an obvious one.
However, none can do total justice to the complexity of social life. As Mack and Snyder (1957) point out: Most social scientists now accept the principle of multiple causality; hence there is no one basic source of conflict. In view of the preoccupation with the evil consequences of conflict, it is not surprising that the literature on causation overbalances the rest. Indeed, so far as particular areas of conflict are concerned, underlying sources have been rather thoroughly catalogued. It is fairly easy merely to list the most significant sources of, say, war.
Conflict, on the other hand, is much more likely to be a "no holds barred" interaction with mutually destructive behaviors as its hallmark, the objective being the injury of the opponent as much as or more than the attainment of a scarce resource. Unfortunately, as the review by Fink (1968) makes clear, the distinction is not so simple, because the shifting conceptual boundaries between conflict and competition illustrate numerous choices that have been made differently by various theorists. Some adopt a broad definition of competition in which conflict becomes a special case, whereas others see competition and conflict as synonymous.